We Didn’t Get the Sarcasm

NEW YORK, NY - JANUARY 05: Donald Trump attends the "Celebrity Apprentice" Red Carpet Event at Trump Tower on January 5, 2015 in New York City. (Photo by Mike Pont/FilmMagic)
NEW YORK, NY – JANUARY 05: Donald Trump attends the “Celebrity Apprentice” Red Carpet Event at Trump Tower on January 5, 2015 in New York City. (Photo by Mike Pont/FilmMagic)

It was all a big joke.

Donald Trump didn’t really mean he would build the greatest wall along the Mexican border.

Mexicans aren’t all thieves and rapists.

Trump doesn’t really want to stop all Muslim immigration.

Trump doesn’t really want to renegotiate NAFTA.

Trump doesn’t really intend to deport all illegal aliens.

Trump actually thinks TPP is a great idea.

NATO is an important treaty.

Putin is not our friend. He has never met him.

Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.

Trump really does not want to be president of the United States.

You are all fired for believing his sarcasm.

“Why the hell can’t you take a joke?”

Mel Brooks at 90 Years Old

Mel Brooks at 90

COMEDY GOD
Mel Brooks Looks Back: ‘Blazing Saddles’ Could Never Get Made Today

The 90-year-old comedy master opens up about his upcoming ‘Blazing Saddles’ event at Radio City Music Hall, political correctness, and the state of comedy today.

Craig Modderno, Daily Beast

 

08.20.16 10:35 PM ET

In a world gone mad, Mel Brooks, now 90, is determined to get people back on his laugh track. Earlier this year, members of the Writers’ Guild of America voted for the 101 funniest screenplays of all time. Brooks was the only writer to have three scripts he wrote or co-wrote in the top 12: his Oscar-winning original screenplay for The Producers, Blazing Saddles, and Young Frankenstein.

On September 1st at New York’s Radio City Music Hall, after a screening of Blazing Saddles, Brook will discuss why the classic western sendup is still a riot 42 years after its theatrical debut. If that weren’t enough, a coffee table book of Young Frankenstein will debut this fall.

Brooks is one of precious few to capture the EGOT, taking home Emmy, Tony Grammy, and Academy Awards. Like Don Rickles, Tony Bennett, and his close friend Carl Reiner, who co- created the 2000 Year Old Man bits, Brooks represents an era of show business that will pass when they do. But until that day comes, this old man river of laughs just keeps rollin’ on.

What did Warner Bros. executives think when they first saw Blazing Saddles?

Mel Brooks: They wanted to bury me and the film. The head of distribution told the owners not to release the picture but they only did because it was already booked in theaters and they didn’t have a picture they could replace it with. Only John Calley, an extremely filmmaker-friendly executive at the studio, championed it. The rest of the executives wouldn’t acknowledge me on the lot even when Blazing Saddles became a huge money maker.”

Why did they hate the film so much?

I actually got notes from the studio head in vivid detail who said, “Lose the fart scene, cut out any racial and ethnic jokes, edit scenes where a horse and an old lady get punched,” and my favorite note: “Can you reshoot Black Bart with a white actor?” If I had made their changes the film would have been just 14 minutes long! I stupidly threw all their notes in the trash. Imagine the book I could have written on them today. Then I had a screening on the lot for anyone who worked there, so the executives couldn’t think I was faking the results. The screening proved everything the big shots hated was funny beyond belief, and yet the big shots didn’t believe the comic tastes of their own employees. I only got my first royalty check recently, which meant it took all these years to show a profit. Hopefully my next check will be in three figures!

And Richard Pryor, of course, was your first choice for Black Bart.

The studio didn’t want him because they said he was unreliable due to his personal problems. I fought hard for Richard and was going to quit the film but he told me not to because he needed his screenwriter fees to pay his mortgage. Then we had a long and expensive search to find the right actor for his part. When Cleavon Little auditioned, Richard was in the room and gave me a signal that he was our man!

What other help did Pryor give you on Blazing Saddles?

When I was getting so much pressure to change the script due to it being offensive to blacks, Pryor stuck behind the work. He said the script, which three other people wrote besides us, was hilarious and if it was compromised in any way then we weren’t going to make the movie we all believed in.

But didn’t you cut one big line from the final edit?

Yes. For some weird reason, and I still can’t explain why… well, there’s a scene in Madeline Kahn’s dark dressing room where she’s below frame making Cleavon very happy. She tells him with satisfaction how big he is, and his initial response, which I cut, was: “You’re sucking on my arm!”

What’s the biggest misconception about Blazing Saddles?

That we shot it in black and white, then we later colored each frame with big crayons.

Do you think Blazing Saddles would ever get made in politically correct 2016? 

No!

How do you feel about Hillary and Trump running for president in 2016?

I don’t do political humor. It’s too passé.

Who makes you laugh today?

Dave Chappelle, Amy Schumer, Sarah Silverman, Nick Kroll, John Mulaney, Maya Rudolph, Zach Galifianakis, Louis C.K., Melissa McCarthy, and Harpo Marx.

What have you learned about pitching projects in today’s Hollywood?

Never go to a studio executive’s office. If you go there, you have a big NO awaiting you. If they come to your office, you’ve got a 50/50 chance for a green-light for your project.

What was your most unusual pitch meeting?

I went to Alan Ladd, Jr., who was running Fox at the time, and pitched him Silent Movie. Even though Young Frankenstein had made him a lot of money, Laddie was very reluctant to do the picture. He said between the slapstick in that film and a non-talkie, it seemed like I really wanted to return to vaudeville, so he said no. I quickly told him I could get Anne Bancroft, Liza Minnelli, Dom DeLuise, Marty Feldman, Marcel Marceau, Paul Newman, and Burt Reynolds, who was the hottest star in Hollywood at the time. I was lying of course, like I’m doing to you now, but Laddie said he’d make the picture if I got all of them. Newman loved the idea of driving a go-kart and not having any dialogue to memorize. I paid Reynolds $25,000 for a day’s work and then told him I need him for three more days. Burt was having fun taking a shower with Dom, me, and Marty in the film, of course, I think—so he stuck around.

Didn’t you have a strange meeting when you tried to pitch Young Frankenstein to Columbia Pictures?

The short version is they wanted to make it but wanted to make it for two million dollars less than its small budget—money Fox made just on the 40th anniversary DVD. My last words at the meeting were, “And we’re going to make it in black and white.” As I’m walking down the hall I realized I was being chased by thirty executives telling me I had no green-light if I wanted to make it in black and white. And this was when Blazing Saddles was making millions of dollars daily, money that somehow disappeared immediately when I asked Warner Brothers when I would receive a royalty check.

With truly unlimited source material, why didn’t you ever make a sequel to History of the World: Part I?

Nobody asked me to. The film made good money. I’d enjoy doing a sequel to that and Spaceballs. There’s still so much you can satirize in both movies.

Do you feel any of your pictures are underrated?

The Twelve Chairs. It was a nice, sweet film with a funny performance by Dom DeLuise—his best, I believe, other than when my wife Anne Bancroft directed him in Fatso. My favorite film nobody saw is Life Stinks. I play a multimillionaire who makes a bet with a peer that he can survive on the streets as a homeless person. You root for this guy and you laugh with him, not at him. You know, basically all my films are about greed versus humanity. I never want people to leave one of my productions feeling depressed. If you come out of the play The Producers humming “Springtime for Hitler” and having a smile on your face, then I’m a happy man. Do you realize the last time I was at Radio City Music Hall was when The Producers won more Tonys than any play in history?! That place is bigger than some New England states. I’m going to be there with Blazing Saddles September 1st. I may be a 2,000-year-old man but I can still see empty seats. Since I’m not getting paid for this fantastic interview I’m giving you, then do your best to help me fill those seats. Is that too subtle?!

OK, but only if you answer one final question: Is it true that Dustin Hoffman was going to receive his first starring role in The Producers?

YES! Dustin came to my house late one night and threw pebbles at the windows of my upstairs apartment. Even then I knew better not to eat with an actor or give them my phone number. Dustin told me he had to drop out of my film, a movie I had spent years trying to get financing for, because he was going to Los Angeles to star in The Graduate. I yelled at him so loud it woke up my fellow renters. I screamed, “You mean you’re deserting me to spend the summer in Hollywood making love to the love of my life [Bancroft]?” Then I gave him my blessing by adding, “Good choice!”

Two Political Parties – One Ruling Class

From THE SPARK, August 8, 2016. It is an opinion letter distributed from Studio City, California (Studio City is a district of Los Angeles). THE SPARK web site: “We want an end to capitalism. We want revolution made by the working class. We want socialism, we want communism.”

The following column was handed to me as I entered the Red Line subway in North Hollywood, California.  There is no reference to socialism or communism in this article.  It is a blast at the Ruling Class.  The two lines BOLDED by me are the critical and the two most important sentences in my opinion.

Donald Trump is everything the Democrats say he is: anti-worker, misogynist, and racist.  He’s vile in the way he maligns whole groups of people; repellant in his pretense to “defend the people who cannot defend themselves”; offensive in his contempt for women; and a ruthless businessman whose history is littered with people he exploited, harmed and cheated.

He claims that he is the only one who can fix the system because “nobody knows it better” than he does. Yes, he knows it – and has used it his whole life, just as the whole capitalist class has used it, to accumulate wealth at the expense of the vast majority of the population, all of us who must work for our living.

This multi-billionaire has spent the last year roaming the country, playing on and reinforcing racist attitudes in the population. He blamed immigrants for the unemployment in this country – in a ploy to hide the truth, that joblessness is created by bosses like Trump who push to squeeze more work out of fewer workers. He blames society’s victims for crime, rather than the system he knows so well and has benefitted from so much, which has impoverished large layers of the population, driving young people who cannot find work into crime. He blames the people in other countries for the wars that ravage the earth, rather than the American capitalist class, of which he is a prize member, a class that exploits people in sweatshops around the world and steals the wealth of other countries.

Trump is a real enemy of working people.

But if anyone believes that Hillary Clinton and the Democrats are our friends, they are living in a dream world.

The Democrats may have a “kinder” language than Trump – but that language is a lie. And behind the lie is a party that turned law and order into a recipe for jailing two generations of young people for whom this system would not provide jobs. Bill Clinton’s administration, supported by both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, pushed through two “anti-crime” laws in the 1990s, which contributed to the shocking 800% increase in the number of people locked away since 1980 – the vast majority for “crimes” that harmed no one, destroyed nothing and took nothing.

The Democrats may pretend to be shocked at Trump’s bellicose language, but the Democrats eagerly joined Republicans to take us into wars that still ravage a large part of the Middle East, wars that have provoked the growth and bitterness of many who flock to ISIS.

At the Democratic Convention Bernie Sanders did what he has always done: talk radical, then fall in line. After calling Clinton the candidate of Wall Street – which she is – he called on his supporters to work for her election! Just like when he spoke against the wars in Iraq and Syria, but then voted the money needed to carry them out.

People worry that if Trump gets in office there may be an increase in overt acts of violence targeting immigrants or black people – and there may well be. But not because of Trump himself, but because behind Trump is a ruling class that has long tried to divide the working class, pitting one part against the other. And the Democrats have played that game as often as the Republicans: divide in order to rule.

This overheated election campaign presents us with the spectacle of two parties competing with each other, both of which are defenders of big business, of the banks, of big property owners and financial speculators.

The only ones not represented in this electoral farce, the ones who will have no voice are working people – that is, the big majority of the population. Voting for either of these two parties simply means we give a stamp of approval to our class enemies.

The big issue this election year, like so many years before, is that the working class does not have a party of its own. We need our own party, a working class party that will be built by all parts of our class: Black, White, Latino and immigrant.

July 2016 Was Earth’s Warmest Month on Record

Global mean temperatures in July 2016 were the warmest on record not just for July, but for any month dating to the late 1800s, according to four separate newly-released analyses. A state of the climate report issued by NOAA Wednesday said that July 2016 was Earth’s warmest month in records dating to 1880.

The average temperature for the globe was 0.87 degrees Celsius above the 20th century average. This beat the previous warmest month on record set in July 2015 which was 0.81 degrees Celsius above average.

Of course global warming deniers will find a way to explain these facts.  The realities of smog will also be denied.  Los Angeles has seen major declines in smog thanks to ever increasing smog control regulations.  China appears to understand the need to impose regulations.

Look at the map below.  Alaska is in the Record Warmest category.

Global Warming Map

Manufacturers returning to America means jobs for robots, not people

Another article in the Los Angeles Times re-states what I have been writing about for a few years. https://coastcontact.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/impact-of-technology-on-the-u-s-economy/

Workers at Bicycle Corporation of America assemble bikes - LA Times 8-14-2016

Workers at Bicycle Corporation of America assemble bikes for Wal-Mart, Target and other retailers. (Bicycle Corporation of America)

Here’s a little reality check on the current presidential campaign and promises by both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton to bring back jobs from overseas.

It’s about a private Michigan company called Ranir, which makes, among other things, the business end of electric toothbrushes. After spending two years and millions of dollars to reengineer its toothbrush heads, Ranir brought back fully one-fifth of that production from China to its facility in Grand Rapids.

There’s just one catch: Thanks to the new robotic manufacturing process that Ranir adopted, it takes only four workers at the American plant to do the same job that almost certainly required dozens more in China.

The story goes that William Lee, an English minister, grew tired of hearing the incessant clicking of his wife’s knitting needles. Alternate versions of the story say that Lee was trying to win the affections of a lady who was more interested in her knitting than she was in him. In 1589, he modified the looms that were used to create rugs with hooks that would form loops that would be released during each pass of the thread, thereby knitting a whole row at once. Lee left his church work and went to secure the blessing of the queen (Elizabeth I) to ensure that no one else could create such a device and allowing him to make a healthy profit. Elizabeth denied his request and Lee went to France to try the same thing. Henri IV granted Lee the rights that he asked for, but was soon assassinated leaving Lee to die poor in 1610. Lee’s brother, James, took the idea back to England and was assisted by a man named Ashton in Nottingham in creating the first knitting factory. It wasn’t long before it was so cheap to create machine knitted clothing that many local hand-knitters were petitioning the government for limits of the business. (Sound familiar?) Lee’s design remained virtually unchanged until the 1700s when it was modified to include the kitting frame and later to accept other materials like lace and silk or create ribbed materials that could stretch.

Just as hand knitters in 1600 could not stop progress, today American factory workers are asking the United States government to stop progress. They might delay progress but in the end things will not be as they were during the industrial revolution.

Yes! It does hurt!

 

Arabic/Islamic States ACTUALLY BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS THEM !

This information was verified by snopes.com.  The Snopes staff says it is difficult to verify everything but for the most part this information is correct.

How they vote in the United Nations:        

Below are the actual voting records of various

Arabic/Islamic States which are recorded in both the US State Department and United Nations records:

Kuwait votes against the United States  67% of the time.

Qatar votes against the United States  67% of the time.

Morocco votes against the United States  70% of the time.

United Arab Emirates votes against the United States  70% of the time.

Jordan  votes against the United States  71% of the time.

Tunisia  votes against the United States  71% of the time.

Saudi Arabia votes against the United States  73% of the time.

Yemen votes against the United States  74% of the time.

Algeria  votes against the United States  74% of the time.

Oman votes against the United States  74% of the time.

Sudan votes against the United States  75% of the time.

Pakistan  votes against the United States  75% of the time.

Libya votes against the United States  76% of the time.

Egypt votes against the United States  79% of the time.

Lebanon votes against the United States  80 % of the time.

India votes against the United States  81% of the time.

Syria  votes against the United States  84% of the time.

Mauritania  votes against the United States  87% of the time. U S Foreign Aid to those who hate us:

Egypt, for example, after voting 79% of the time against the United States, still receives $2,000,000,000 (that is $2 Billion) annually in US Foreign Aid.

Jordan votes 71% against the United States and receives $192,814,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.

Pakistan votes 75% against the United States receives $6,721,000,000annually in US Foreign Aid.

India votes 81% against the United States receives $143,699,000annually in US Foreign Aid.

THEY ACTUALLY BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS THEM !.

 

Perhaps it’s time to get out of the UN and give the tax savings back to the American workers who are having to skimp and sacrifice to pay the taxes. 

Loose Lips Sink Ships

Loose lips sink ships is an American English idiom meaning “beware of unguarded talk”.

Quite arguably one of the most famous and effective propaganda posters, “Loose Lips Might Sink Ships” links sharing war secrets with the loss of American life and attacks on the Navy. This slogan, created by the War Advertising Council, quite literally meant that citizens should avoid talking about ship movements, destinations and deployments because that information could easily be intercepted by the enemy at a grave cost. This propaganda poster is a prime example of how a simple, clear and memorable slogan can convey the severity of an issue and influence public behavior.

In an interview Donald Trump did with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt on Thursday morning, in which Hewitt attempted multiple times to get Trump to say he was being metaphorical or hyperbolic, Trump repeatedly refused — and insisted he really meant Obama was a founder of ISIS.

Hewitt prodded Trump, suggesting the GOP nominee meant that Obama “created the vacuum, he lost the peace,” and was not to be taken literally. But Trump objected.

“No, I meant he’s the founder of ISIS. I do. He was the most valuable player. I give him the most valuable player award. I give her, too, by the way, Hillary Clinton,” Trump said.

Hewitt tried again, saying: “But he’s not sympathetic to them. He hates them. He’s trying to kill them.”

“I don’t care,” Trump replied. “He was the founder. His, the way he got out of Iraq was that that was the founding of ISIS, okay?”

Today, Friday, Trump attempted to walk back tweeting “”Ratings challenged @CNN reports so seriously that I call President Obama (and Clinton) “the founder” of ISIS, & MVP. THEY DON’T GET SARCASM?”

Did Hewitt take Trump’s words as sarcasm? I don’t think so. Hewitt is a very serious guy. He made every effort to obtain a clarification from Trump.

As president would he be threatening sanctions, tariff imposition, or war and then say “Oh, I was joking” or “That was sarcasm. I really didn’t mean what I said.”

You want this man as commander-in-chief of the United States?

Deciding Who would be the Worst of the Candidates for President

My family says I am obsessed with the campaign for president. I admit they are correct. I want a president who really can lead a unified nation. That is not the situation today. Sadly Barack Obama’s speech about the United States: “there’s not a liberal America and a conservative America there’s the United States of America.” did not enable him to create his dream. Instead there has been gridlock for most of his presidency.

Consequently Hillary Clinton, who says she supports most of the Obama presidency, is not a choice America wants to make. Additionally she continues to avoid telling the truth about Benghazi, the Clinton Global Initiative, and her email carelessness.

The problem is that Donald Trump is so extreme in his ideas and lacks the experience in government that is needed makes Clinton look like the better choice in November.

 The Muslim ban, the David Duke denial, the “Mexican” judge flap, the draft dodger denigrating John McCain’s military service, the son of privilege attacking an immigrant Gold Star mother and the constant revisionism and lying about past political positions taken are but a few of the lowlights that have punctuated Donald Trump’s chaotic chase for the presidency.” Joe Scarborough

Trump:

  1. Said he would considering withdrawing from NATO and other similar agreements such as our promise to help Japan and South Korea in the event of an attack.
  2. Suggested that nuclear weapons in the hands of more countries would be a good thing.
  3. Said he might abrogate many of the trade pacts that the United States has negotiated.
  4. Said he would stop Muslims entering the country from any country with an Islamic terrorist problem.
  5. Suggested that libel laws be changed that would enable him to sue the media.
  6. Will lower the income taxes for the wealthy and end inheritance taxes.
  7. Deport all illegal aliens.
  8. Willing to invite Russia to hack Clinton email.
  9. Suggested the use of guns to protect 2nd Amendment rights.
  10. Said there is no drought in California.

Personally I cannot support either of these candidates for president. Unless one of them offers some new wise words to justify my vote, I will be supporting a third party candidate. You should too!

Odd American Automobiles

 

1960 Checker Marathon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Checker Marathon

Checker Taxi was an American taxi company. It used the Checker Marathon produced by Checker of Kalamazoo, Michigan.  Although you could buy the car for personal use it was manufactured primarily for the cab company.  It’s boxy design offered easy access to the rear seat and a large trunk.  The first cars were on the streets of New York and Chicago in 1963 and were built through 1978. July 26, 1999 was the last day for the company.

 

 

1977 Ford Ranchero

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ford Ranchero

In 1957, the Ford Ranchero introduced American consumers to the Australian oddity of the “coupe utility,” a two-door coupe with a truck bed fused to the rear end. Ford Australia had invented a car that could take the family to church or throw cargo in the back, a compromise between a commercial utility vehicle and the wheel-bed and cost of a passenger vehicle. So while it might look like a small pickup truck, the Ford Ranchero was built on the body of a station wagon.

2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chrysler PT Cruiser

At one point in time, the Chrysler PT Cruiser won Car of the Year. Now, the PT Cruiser is a series regular on lists of the worst cars ever made. What explains the dramatic fall of this controversial vehicle? It’s not just changing tastes, although that’s part of the equation. The PT Cruiser just didn’t stand up to scrutiny. First launched in 2001, the PT Cruiser was a 5-door hatchback designed to evoke the gangster getaway cars of the 1930s, featuring smooth curves, fat fenders, and a high roofline.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

AMC Gremlin

Love it or hate it, the AMC Gremlin has to be one of the strangest designs of the last fifty years. This little two-door hatchback epitomized the wonky economy cars of the 1970s. The Gremlin was the brainchild of American Motors Company, a now-defunct automaker with a storied tradition as America’s underdog. The Gremlin was dirt cheap with great gas mileage and AMC aimed the cheekily-named car at people who wanted something a little cute and a lot different.

1971 Ford Pinto

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ford Pinto

The Ford Pinto was nothing special, in and of itself. It was a relatively boring and practical subcompact economy car designed to compete with Japanese imports. Uncomfortable bucket seats, uninspired lines, and a subpar inline 4-cylinder engine meant that the 1971 Pinto was never going to turn heads. Unfortunately, Ford sacrificed reliability for production speed and cost. In 1977, damning reports emerged that the tiny car had squeezed the fuel tank right behind the rear bumper—resulting in explosive fires in the event of a crash.

1974 Bricklin green right

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bricklin SV-1

What happens when a multi-millionaire decides he wants to start his own automaker and slaps his name on the car? The Bricklin SV-1. This bizarre two-door coupe with gullwing doors and the appearance and color of a plastic toy was the pet project of Malcolm Bricklin. Bricklin convinced investors to sink millions into a brand-new car company and manufacturing plant in New Brunswick. Only 2,854 had rolled off the assembly line when investors balked and the government forced the company into receivership.

1990 Pontiac Trans Sport

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pontiac Trans Sport

The Pontiac Trans Sport was a real disappointment even for minivan buyers. In 1986, General Motors was determined to contest Chrysler’s dominant position in the minivan market.

1975 AMC Pacer

 

 

 

 

 

AMC Pacer

When the AMC Pacer came out in 1975 it was the toast of the automotive press, which called it “futuristic,” “bold” and “unique.” AMC even produced an electric version to respond to the gasoline crisis of the 1970s. The enormous glass bubble windshield and bizarre rear window earned the Pacer the moniker “the flying fishbowl.”  In production from 1975 to 1980.

1958 Packard Hawk

 

 

 

 

 

 

Packard Hawk

What happens when you combine two legacy automakers and pump out a shoddy combination of two great cars? The 1958 Packard Hawk, the last gasp of a dying marque. In 1954, the Big Three were starting to put the hurt on the competition. Smaller car companies were under a lot of pressure to compete and “merger fever” led to the marriage of Studebaker and Packard. Packard had been a luxury carmaker while Studebaker had a larger customer base and manufacturing capability.

1957 Rambler Custom Cross-Country wagon AnnMD-e

Rambler Cross Country

The Rambler was a wonky car that earned its place in American car history by standing out from the crowd in a good way. Rambler was a popular make produced by the American Motors Company but in 1957 the new company was still figuring out how to market and sell the vehicles. In 1954, AMC had been formed by the merger of the Nash-Kelvinator and Hudson Motor Car Company and the Ramblers had been rebadged interchangeably as Nash and Hudson cars and in 1955, the Rambler Six was a big hit. The affordable but stylish car pioneered the compact car in America! Drivers loved the new size and in 1957, AMC rebadged the Ramblers as their own marque to capitalize on their popularity. The Rambler Six was joined by the Rambler Cross Country, a four-door hardtop station wagon based on the previous compact.

MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

Dodge Rampage

The 1982 Dodge Rampage is another coupe utility that had a bad attitude for an underperforming vehicle. The two-door coupe utility was built on a unibody subcompact car with a tiny cargo bed. Chrysler based the Rampage on the light L platform designed in response to the 1970s energy crisis. Unfortunately, what that means is that the Dodge Rampage ended up looking like a toy rather than a real car, but Dodge wanted it to be a monster truck! Let’s just say that it makes sense that the Plymouth clone using the same frame and design was called the “Scamp” rather than the “Rampage.”

2004 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chevrolet Malibu Maxx

In 2004, Chevrolet made the bizarre decision to take the solid if unremarkable Malibu and try and market an overloaded hatchback as an “extended sedan.” Hatchbacks were always a tenuous sell—attracting a certain type of driver who wanted efficiency and economy more than style or performance—and the Malibu was fighting an uphill battle to avoid falling in with the hatchback crowd.

1979 AMC Eagle Wagon

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMC Eagle Wagon

Sometimes a wonky design can work miracles. Once again, AMC was back to pioneer a new market segment: the very first compact four-wheel drive passenger vehicle. Now it’s known as the very first crossover SUV. But at the time, AMC needed to update its aging passenger fleet and made a smart move to combine economy and fuel efficiency with the rugged appeal of the popular AMC Jeep. The resulting car was designed to be comfortable with good handling on the pavement and offroad. It wasn’t a full-fledged recreational vehicle, but an added benefit for regular drivers. AMC quickly added a station wagon marketed to families and drivers looking for an adventurous vehicle with good performance, and the Eagle Wagon was an immediate hit especially in regions with a lot of snow.

2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo

 

 

 

 

 

Chevrolet Monte Carlo

The Chevrolet Monte Carlo billed itself as a “Super Sports” car drawing on Chevrolet’s racing legacy…and fell very, very short. The two-door coupe had sporty lines, but GM made some strange decisions when it came to the interior and what went under the hood. If you approached the Monte Carlo SS from the side, it looked good—not great, but good.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Pontiac Aztek

Who can forget the car that killed Pontiac? The 2001 Pontiac Aztek will go down in history with one of the strangest designs in history. General Motors was trying to jumpstart a design renaissance after a decade of dull and uninteresting vehicles—unfortunately, it went a little too far with the Aztek. The designers were told to be aggressive, and they drafted an edgy mid-size sports crossover. On paper, Pontiac was trying to appeal to young new car buyers who wanted a fresh vehicle. But design drift saw the Aztek laden with the frills and features of a minivan, including an unfolding rear door with indented seats, a central console with a removable cooler, and even a camping add-on with an attachable tent and an inflatable mattress. Foolishly, the features jacked up the price to $22,000-$27,000, outside the price range of its target demographic of young consumers.  If the Aztek had the style to match the features and the price, maybe it wouldn’t have mattered.

1971 Mercury Cougar

 

 

 

 

Mercury Cougar

The 1971 Cougar is a great example of the unfortunate decisions that can kill a great car. When the 1964 Ford Mustang first appeared it created a brand new type of car: the pony car, muscular and stylish but compact and affordable. Mercury was a marque that produced upscale versions of Ford vehicles at a higher price point, and in 1967 Mercury created a similar pony car to complement the Ford Mustang with a premium coupe with luxury and serious power. The handsome Cougars had a European flair and plush interior that differentiated them from their Ford counterparts without sacrificing speed and size. But in 1971, Mercury did everything it could to kill a great pony car.  A significant redesign witnessed the loss of the handsome flair of the original make.

1980 Cadillac Seville

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cadillac Seville

The 1980 Cadillac Seville was just a design disaster on almost every level. 1975, Cadillac struggled with competing luxury imports from Germany, BMW and Mercedes-Benz. Studies had shown that Cadillac attracted an exclusively older crowd, and GM decided to design a new sedan to attract younger buyers. The 1975 Cadillac Seville was a brand-new car, smaller and more compact than ever before with a crisp and angular appearance. Still, the new buyers were older than GM wanted, especially wealthy middle-aged women who liked a smaller car that was easier to park! GM design chief Bill Mitchell wanted to experiment further rather than stay the course and, unfortunately, designers created a car that appealed to his…unique…tastes.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Buick Electra 225

Some cars have style. Some cars have muscle. Some cars are just…bold. The colossal 1959 Buick Electra 225 was the last, best “King of Chrome.” Over eighteen feet long, the 225-inch “deuce and a quarter” was 4,900 pounds of premium in-your-face American automobile. In 1959, Buick was looking to reverse two years slump in sales with something fresh and bold. They radically redesigned the Buick lineup with all-new styling, wide molding, slanted headlights, and “delta” fins along the trunk that looked like a rocket ship. The Electra 225 was the crown jewel of the new lineup with impressive trim and luxury features.

1958 Edsel Pacer1958 Edsel - rear photo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edsel

The fall of Edsel became a synonym for corporate disaster. You might not have heard of Edsel unless you’re a vintage car collector because Edsel cars were only produced and sold from 1957 to 1960. Developed as a new marque for Ford, Edsel was supposed to be a luxury car that could compete with Chrysler and GM and pioneer new technologies and a stunning new style.

1982 Cadillac Cimmarron

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cadillac Cimarron

In 1982, Cadillac was back with a second attempt to sell a compact car against all odds. After the disappointment of the understrength, undersized Seville, you’d think that Cadillac would have been more careful! Cadillac still needed a new car that was less like a cargo barge and more like a speedboat. Smaller and more efficient imports from the likes of Mercedes-Benz continued to cut into Cadillac’s market share. While Cadillac struggled to identify a new design and a new name, General Motors had been working on a new platform known as the “J-Body” and Cadillac, desperate to bring a nimbler car onto the market, seized on the opportunity to cut costs and speed up production. Infamously, GM’s President Pete Este even warned Cadillac General Manager Ed Kennard that the new frame wasn’t ready for a luxury car, saying, “Ed, you don’t have time to turn the J-car into a Cadillac.” Kennard didn’t listen, or, worse, he didn’t care. The Cadillac Cimarron was born, a strange combination of poor engineering and wonky branding.

1971 Chevrolet Vega

 

 

 

 

 

Chevrolet Vega

The Chevrolet Vega as a kissing cousins with the Ford Pinto, the Vega lacked the explosive legacy of the Pinto but was plagued with a series of disastrous recalls. At first, the Vega seemed like a promising vehicle that could compete with a wave of imported compacts from Japan and Germany. The Vega had sleeker lines than the Pinto, with decent fuel economy and good handling. Initial sales were brisk, and soon hundreds of thousands were in the hands of drivers. That was when the first problems began to appear, compounded by the fact that the fraction of real lemons was magnified by the sheer volume of vehicles on the road!

1953 Hudson Jet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hudson Jet

The crippling cost of developing and marketing the Hudson Jet was the final nail in the coffin for the small automaker. While the Jet was hardly a terrible vehicle, it was not a great one either, and the oversized and overpriced sedan was an ignoble end for the Hudson Motor Car Company. Hudson had once been one of the largest automakers in America, but by 1951 the company was struggling to compete with the Big Three. Saddled with an aging stable of luxurious full-sized cars when the market was shifting towards smaller and more practical vehicles, Hudson knew it needed a bold new model to recapture the public interest and put drivers in the seat. Unfortunately, money was tight, and Hudson didn’t have the financial leeway to take a lot of chances or develop a new full-sized vehicle that would appeal to their current owners. Instead, they pinned their hopes on a new “compact” inspired by the Nash Rambler.

1961 Metropolitan

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metropolitan

This car is usually called the Metro. After launching the popular Rambler, Nash worked for many years on an even smaller car. Its first public concept, the NXI (Nash Experimental International), was shown in 1949, followed after one year by the NKI (Nash Kelvinator International). The name of the car was to be NKI Custom until shortly after production began, and new badges had to be retrofitted to early cars. The concepts were designed by independent stylist William Flajole, using the Fiat 500 chassis and running gear; the Nash Metropolitan was styled by Battista “Pinin” Farina.

Nash engineered the body and suspension, but they used Austin’s little 1.2 liter (73 cubic inch) four-cylinder A-40 engine. Small but well engineered, the engine had aluminum pistons, overhead valves, a counterbalanced crankshaft, and a Zenith downdraft carburetor. Its low compression (7.2:1) allowed it to use poor gasoline, but it only had 42 horsepower; 0-60 times were around 30 seconds, nearly double that of the flat-head six-cylinder Plymouth Savoy. The transmission was a three-speed manual column shift.

Starting in 1954, Austin built the Nash Metropolitan under contract, using Fisher & Ludlow bodies, in Longbridge, England. The car was then shipped to the United States. There were two models, both two-doors: a convertible and hardtop. They were unit-body designs, at a time when most cars were body-on-frame.

Shortly before the Metropolitan was launched, Nash merged with Hudson to form the American Motors Corporation. It would later drop both brands in favor of Rambler and, later, AMC, but for now, the staid, upscale Hudson dealers were sent Hudson Metropolitans.

1948 Studebaker Coupe1948 Studebaker Coupe Rear

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Studebaker

The Studebaker 1948 Coupe was a big hit. The design was unique because the rear looked like the front.

1983-Delorean-dmc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DeLorean DMC-12

The DeLorean DMC-12 is a sports car that was manufactured in Northern Ireland to be sold in America from 1981 to 1982. The car is most commonly referred to as the DeLorean, as it was the only model ever produced by the company. The first prototype appeared in 1976 and 9,000 DeLoreans were produced by 1982, when production stopped. Today, only about 6,500 of these cars are believed to exist. This car is most well known for being used as a time machine in the “Back to the Future” movies.

Is Donald Trump a serious candidate for president of the United States?

When Peggy Noonan thinks the GOP candidate is crazy it really is time for Republicans to re-think their support for the unhinged Donald Trump.

At a CNN Libertarian Party town hall hosted by Anderson Cooper on Wednesday (August 3), Bill Weld outright mocked Trump — saying he has “a screw loose.”

Charles Krauthammer in his latest column: “It’s that he can’t help himself. His governing rule in life is to strike back when attacked, disrespected or even slighted. To understand Trump, you have to grasp the General Theory: He judges every action, every pronouncement, every person by a single criterion — whether or not it/he is “nice” to Trump.” Krauthammer’s contentions do support the screw loose contention of Bill Weld.

 David Axelrod said that if Donald Trump were trying to lose this election, he would not behave any differently than he has in the last few days.Source: CNN

There have been more than a few commentaries suggesting that Trump really does not want the presidency and is intentionally saying things that would make him unacceptable to most Americans. Of course there is also his own contention that the elections are rigged, If that was a true “fact” it would give him a way to say he can’t win and rather than going through the humiliation of a loss he has decided to withdraw from the campaign.

The Libertarian ticket is looking more appealing by the day. With 94 more days until election day we all have plenty of time to change our minds multiple times.