Twelve States Will Determine the Next President of the U.S.A.

While twelve states determine the winner of the presidency, the choice of the majority can and has been overruled by a silly, stupid election system.

As we all know there is no national direct election for president of the United   States.  Instead the constitution requires electors to vote for the president.  The system has evolved into a popular vote in each state. The winner of each state determines that the state’s total electors vote for the winning candidate.   Thus, if a majority of California voters select Obama in the next election then the total number of electors (the sum equals the congressman and senators) are given entirely to Obama.  Whichever candidate wins 270 electors is the winner. The winner of the most electors can lose the popular vote as George W. Bush did in the 2000 election.

Since pollsters can tell the candidates what the likely outcome is for each state, the candidates will focus their campaigning on those states that they are narrowly losing.

Thus there are just 12 states that will most likely determine who will win the November election.  Most polls indicate that the determining states are North   Carolina (15), Pennsylvania (20), Michigan (16), Minnesota (10), Nevada (6), Virginia (13), Florida (29), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), New   Hampshire (4), and Colorado (9).

The election process is inequitable to the majority of the people since the four largest population centers in the nation are not in any of those states.

Why the IOC will never memorialize the ’72 Munich massacre

Posted by David Bancroft

Why the IOC will never memorialize the ’72 Munich massacre

By Guri Weinberg

Published July 27, 2012

FoxNews.com

Recently, new information about the Munich Massacre at the 1972 Olympic Games was released by German police as a result of pressure from German investigative reporters. It was reported that the “Black September” terrorists were helped by a Nazi group in Germany to get fake IDs, weapons and access to the Olympic Village.

This was not too shocking, as the head of the IOC in 1972 was Avery Brundage, a Nazi sympathizer and anti-Semite. His protege, Juan Samaranch, eventually served the second longest IOC term as president, but his support of Nazis and the Spanish dictator Francisco Franco was kept a dirty secret. Most IOC members knew the truth but stayed silent because he organized a regal lifestyle for them — with money diverted from sport.

‘I want all of you to lose your jobs and be replaced by real Olympians who care about the athletes and believe in the Olympic charter.’

Another interesting fact is that Abu Iyad, one of the co-founders of the PLO, has said publicly that the reason “Black September” chose the 1972 Olympics as the stage for their hostage plot was because the PLO’s request to the IOC for inclusion of the Palestinian delegation at the Olympic Games was completely ignored. This snub from the IOC came at a time when tension was at a boiling point in the Middle East. Yet, having incited the PLO, the IOC denied the Israeli government’s request for security for the athletes.

In 1996, I, along with other Munich orphans and three of the widows, were invited for the first time to the Olympic Games in Atlanta. Before the Opening Ceremony, we met with Alex Gilady. Gilady has been a member of the IOC’s Radio and Television Commission since 1984 and has been the senior vice president of NBC Sports since 1996.

I have known Mr. Gilady since I was a kid; in fact, I grew up with his daughter. He had been supportive in the past regarding our plea for a moment of silence during the Opening Ceremonies, so we arrived with high hopes. Gilady informed us that a moment of silence was not possible because if the IOC had a moment of silence for the Israeli athletes, they would also have to do the same for the Palestinians who died at the Olympics in 1972.

My mother said, “But no Palestinian athletes died.”

Gilady responded, “Well, there were Palestinians who died at the 1972 Olympics.”

I heard one of the widows say to Gilady, “Are you equating the murder of my husband to the terrorists that killed him?”

Silence.

 Then Ilana Romano burst out with a cry that has haunted me to this day. She screamed at Gilady, “How DARE you! You KNOW what they did to my husband! They let him lay there for hours, dying slowly, and then finished him off by castrating him and shoving it in his mouth, ALEX!”

I looked at Gilady’s face as he sat there, stone cold with no emotion. This man knew these athletes personally. This man led the Israeli media delegation at the 1972 Olympics and saw this atrocity first hand. This man saw my father’s dead, naked body thrown out front of the Olympic Village for all the world to see. Without a hint of empathy, Gilady excused himself from our meeting.

That’s when I understood that the IOC wasn’t turning us down because of their resistance to :politics.” Rather, it was due to the specific politics the IOC apparently still embraces. Based on its history of Nazi support, greed and the blood on their own hands for inciting the PLO, they would never support Israeli athletes.

Now, I have a message to all the members of the IOC. The torture inflicted by “Black September” on the 11 Israeli athletes and their families took 48 hours. Your torture of the families and the memories of those esteemed athletes has lasted 40 years. I am not satisfied with a moment of silence in every Opening Ceremony of the Summer Games. Now I want all of you to lose your jobs and be replaced by real Olympians who care about the athletes and believe in the Olympic charter.

The threat of the IOC coming after me does not scare me anymore. When you have no more dignity, you have nothing to lose. So, members of the IOC — my name is Guri Weinberg and I am the son of Moshe Weinberg, the wrestling coach murdered at the 1972 Olympics. And I am not going away.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/07/27/why-ioc-will-never-memorialize-72-munich-massacre/#ixzz21xCRYCKN

Patriot

What is a patriot? Microsoft Word offers the following synonyms: loyalist, nationalist, flag-waver, partisan, compatriot or fellow-citizen, and jingoist.

Germans fought for their nation during WWII.  They were probably not all Nazis but they were loyal to their nation and wanted to see their nation win the war. Those loyalists were patriots.  So a patriot is someone who feels a strong support for his or her country.  Apparently it is a blind allegiance.

Strangely Ron Paul, while campaigning for the presidency, said that while Army soldier Bradley Manning’s may have “technically” broken the law against releasing classified information to WikiLeaks, he did so for the purpose of exposing the “horrible things” being carried out by the U.S. Government. Referring to Manning’s detention before trial, Paul said, “Should he be locked up and imprisoned?” Manning should be seen as a “political hero” and “true patriot who reveals what’s going on,” Paul said.

Using the Ron Paul logic; Daniel Ellsberg, an employee of the Rand Corporation would also be a patriot.  Ellsberg precipitated a national political controversy in 1971 when he released the Pentagon Papers, a top-secret Pentagon study of U.S. government decision-making in relation to the Vietnam War, to The New York Times and other newspapers. He was awarded the Right Livelihood Award in 2006.

Most definitely our volunteer army is made up of patriots.

Dictionary.com provided these two definitions

1. a person who loves, supports, and defends his or her country and its interests with devotion.

2. a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, especially of individual rights, against presumed interference by the federal government.

My definition is a person who fights in every way he can to make his country the very best.

Mormons in Israel

For those of you who do not read the Los Angeles Times this article will be of interest.  I do not trust Mitt Romney because he has been a serial flip-flopper.  There is hardly a position he took as governor of Massachusetts that he has not changed. If you can believe him, Romney says he would never criticize Israel and would be a steadfast ally to the Jewish state. You could call it politics but there does not appear to be any issue that is core to his beliefs.  Still this article may give you pause to at least listen to his campaign.

Mormons in Israel

By Rafael Medoff

Mitt Romney’s trail to the Holy Land was blazed by a Utah missionary a century ago.

Mitt Romney at the Western (Wailing) Wall in JerusalemMITT ROMNEY’S visit to Israel will gener­ate much specula­tion on the role Jew­ish voters will play in the U.S. presidential election. His visit may also spark discussion about Mormon-Jewish relations in the wake of the recent controversy over a Mormon temple that con­ducted posthumous baptism cere­monies for some Holocaust vic­tims.

But another Mormon’s visit to Jerusalem, 99 years ago, deserves some of the spotlight too. Because that little-known visit ultimately had a decisive impact on Jewish history and America’s response to the Holocaust.

In 1913, 29-year-old Elbert Thomas and his wife, Edna, wrapped up their five-year stint in charge of a Mormon mission in J a­pan and prepared to return to their native utah. They decided to pay a short visit to Turkish-occupied Palestine on the way home.

The Holy Land figures promi­nently in Mormon theological tracts. Thomas was keenly aware of Mormon prophecies about an in- . gathering of the Jewish exiles and the rebirth of the Jewish home­land.

“We sat one evening on the Mount of Olives and overlooked Je­rusalem,” he later recalled. “We read the poetry and the prophecy, the forebodings and the prayers, with hearts that reached up to God.” Under “stars the likes of which you see nowhere else in the world but on our own American desert, out where I grew up,” Thomas read the lengthy “Prayer of Dedication on the Mount of Ol­ives” by Orson Hyde, an early Mor­mon leader and fervent Christian Zionist.

“Consecrate this land … for the gathering together of Judah’s scat­tered remnants … for the building up of Jerusalem again after it has been trodden down by the Gentiles so long,” Hyde had written in 1841. “Restore the kingdom unto Israel, raise up Jerusalem as its capital…. Let that nation or people who shall take an active part in behalf of Abraham’s children, and in the raising of Jerusalem, find favor in Thy sight. Let not their enemies prevail against them … but let the glory oflsrael overshadow them.”

The moment, the mood and the words moved Thomas to feel a deep spiritual connection to the Jewish people and to commit him­self to becoming one of those who would “take an active part in behalf of Abraham’s children.” And three decades later, he was presented with an opportunity to do so.

In the 1940s, as a U.S. senator from utah, Thomas became deeply concerned about the plight of the Jews in Nazi Europe. He joined the Emergency Committee to Save the Jewish People of Europe, a lobby­ing group led by Jewish activist Pe­ter Bergson. Thomas signed on to its full-page newspaper ads criti­cizing the Allies for abandoning European Jewry. He also co­chaired Bergson’s 1943 conference on the rescue of Jews, which chal­lenged the Roosevelt administra­tion’s claim that nothing could be done to help the Jews except win­ning the war. Although a loyal Democrat and New Dealer, the Utah senator boldly broke ranks with President Franklin D. Roose­velt over the refugee issue.

Thomas played a key role in ad­vancing a Bergson-initiated con­gressional resolution calling for creation of a government agency to rescue Jews from the Nazis. Sen. Tom Connally CD-Texas), chair­man of the Senate Foreign Rela­tions Committee, initially blocked consideration of the resolution. But when Connally took ill one day, Thomas, as acting chair, quickly in­troduced the measure. It passed unanimously.

Meanwhile, senior aides to Treasury Secretary Henry Mor­genthau Jr. had discovered that State Department officials had
been obstructing opportunities to rescue Jewish refugees. Morgen­thau realized, as he told his staff, that the time had come to say to the president, “You have either got to move very fast, or the Congress of the United States will do it for you.” Armed with a devastating re­port prepared by his staff, and with congressional pressure mounting, Morgenthau went to FDR in Janu­aryI944.

Roosevelt could read the writ­ing on the wall. With just days to go before the full Senate would act on the resolution, Roosevelt pre­empted Thomas and the other congressional advocates of rescue by imilaterally creating the agency they were demanding: the War Refugee Board.

Although understaffed and underfunded, the board played a major role in saving more than 200,000 Jews during the final 15 months of the war. Among other things, the board’s agents per­suaded a young Swede, Raoul Wal­lenberg, to go to German-occupied Budapest in 1944. There, with the board’s financial backing, he undertook his now-famous rescue mission. Thomas’ action in the Senate was an indispensable part of the chain of events that led to Wallenberg’s mission.

The Swedish government, to­gether with Holocaust institutions and Jewish communities around the world, recently launched a yearlong series of events com­memorating this summer’s 100th anniversary of Wallenberg’s birth. One hopes these celebrations will include appropriate mention ofthe role played by Americans such as Thomas in making Wallenberg’s work possible.

And as Romney retraces some of Thomas’ steps in Jerusalem, he will have special reason to feel proud of the role played by a fellow Mormon in helping to save Jewish lives.

RAFAEL MEDOFF is director of the David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and the coauthor with Sonja Schoepf Wentling of the new book “Herbert Hoover and the Jews: The Origins of the ‘Jewish Vote’ and Bipartisan Support for Israel.”

Presidential Campaign is Down and Dirty

This week has been a big win for Obama. What can we conclude? The Obama re-election team has managed to distract the news media.

Rather than talking about the state of the economy talk shows and others are talking about Romney’s management of Bain Capital and the fact that Romney has released only two years of his income taxes. If we aren’t talking about those things we are talking about Romney’s bank accounts in other countries. Vanity Fair ran an article on the Romney off shore accounts that was replicated in the Huffington Post and the NY Daily News.

 

To finish off the week CNN State of the Union, CBS Face the Nation, and NBC Meet the Press all started their programs with interviews focused on Mitt Romney.  Even Fox News Sunday found itself discussing the attacks on Romney. 

Adding insult to injury BusinessWeek’s latest edition offered this derogatory cover.

BusinessWeek cover 7-16-2012
BusinessWeek cover 7-16-2012

 

If Obama’s re-election team can keep up the distractions you just might not vote for Romney. Surveys seem to bear out the success of the Democrats. That leads to the conclusion that we will see more of the same.

Essentially the Obama campaign has made Romney’s life the issue rather than the Obama presidency. It’s what George W. Bush did to John Kerry.

This is a very sad situation for Americans. With no stated economic plan from either Romney or Obama, Americans will not be focused on the real issues that face the nation. It probably won’t matter because there is no evidence that either one has a plan. That may be because neither of the candidates wants to address the issues.

Do You Own an Offshore Bank Account?

I know that few of you do.  One person that does is the Republican candidate for president, Mitt Romney.  Just Google the above question and you will obtain quite a few responses.  Google, “Romney’s secret offshore bank accounts.”  You will see articles posted by Vanity Fair, Huffington Post, and the NY Daily News.  I know what you are thinking.  Those are all Liberal news companies.  You would be wrong.  The NY Daily News is owned by one wealthy businessman, Mort Zuckerman.  The same Mort Zuckerman who also owns U.S. News & World Report.  The same Mort Zuckerman who has been appearing as a guest on many political talk shows and slamming Barack Obama.

Mitt and Ann Romney
Mitt and Ann Romney

This is the New York Daily News report.

Mitt Romney’s massive fortune – estimated to be as high as $250 million – is held in a complex and opaque network of offshore havens that are impossible to penetrate, according to a report in Vanity Fair.

By / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Mitt Romney’s massive fortune – estimated to be as high as $250 million – is held in a complex and opaque network of offshore havens that are impossible to penetrate, according to a report in Vanity Fair.

Romney had a Swiss bank account and has interests in tax havens like Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. The Romney campaign has insisted he does not use the havens to avoid paying U.S. taxes, but Vanity Fair wrote it is impossible to confirm that he is not seeing a savings.

The Republican candidate paid a 14 percent tax rate on $21.7 million in income in 2010 – far lower than the rate paid by many Americans because his earnings comes from investments rather than wages.

Vanity Fair noted that Romney has continued to receive large payments from Bain Capital since leaving the private equity firm in 1999.

Romney has personal interests in at least a dozen of the 138 or more funds organized by Bain in the Cayman Islands. Vanity Fair said the Romney-related funds are worth as much as $30 million and hidden behind confidentiality disclaimers.

READ MORE: MITT ROMNEY HOLDS MILLIONS IN CAYMAN ISLES TAX HAVEN, BUT SAYS ‘I’M NO TAX DODGER’

The report also raised questions about Romney’s blind trusts, which are used by politicians to remove conflicts of interests by turning investment control over to an independent trustee.

Romney’s financial disclosure form lists 25 such investments in an open-ended category labeled “over $1 million,” Vanity Fair reported. Many of them are set up in tax havens like the Cayman Islands.

Meanwhile, the Romney campaign is distancing itself from the CEO of Barclays, who stepped down from the British bank Tuesday amid an interest-rate fixing scandal.

Robert Diamond will no longer co-host a London fundraiser scheduled for July 27 when Romney will be in town for the Olympics.

“Mr. Diamond decided to step aside as a co-host for the upcoming London reception to focus all his attention on Barclays,” Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul told The Financial Times. “We respect his decision.” The fundraiser will go on without the former CEO.

Barclays was fined $453 million last week by U.S. and British regulators for submitting false reports on interbank borrowing rates between 2005 and 2009.

Can Anyone Fix This Economy?

Read Mitt’s plan then read Barack’s plan.  If it’s “the economy stupid” then where is the plan to set the nation on a course to recovery?

The number of new employees added to the job payrolls has been less than breathtaking. With 5 million long term unemployed is anything other than low pay service sector jobs going to be created in the coming years?  The number of new June jobs is 80,000.  The unemployment rate remains at 8.2% for a second straight month.  That is less than the number required to keep pace with our growing population according to most economists.  Perhaps the better question to ask is what are the plans of the two candidates for president?

From Mitt Romney’s campaign web site.

Mitt’s Plan

Mitt Romney sees two important objectives that America can pursue immediately to build on the extraordinary traditional strengths of its workforce. The first is to retrain American workers to ensure that they have the education and skills to match the jobs of today’s economy. The second is to attract the best and the brightest from around the world.
   

Retraining Workers

Mitt Romney will approach retraining policy with a conservative mindset that recognizes it as an area where the federal government is particularly ill-equipped to succeed. Retraining efforts must be founded upon a partnership that brings together the states and the private sector. The sprawling federal network of redundant bureaucracies should be dismantled and the funds used for better purposes. One particularly promising approach that Romney supports and believes states should be encouraged to pursue is a system of Personal Reemployment Accounts for unemployed individuals. These accounts would facilitate programs that place individuals directly into companies that provide on-the-job training—as governor of Massachusetts, Romney helped create just such a program.

  • Eliminate redundancy in federal retraining programs by consolidating programs and funding streams, centering as much activity as possible in a single agency
  • Give states authority to manage retraining programs by block granting federal funds
  • Facilitate the creation of Personal Reemployment Accounts
  • Encourage greater private sector involvement in retraining programs

Attracting the Best and the Brightest

To ensure that America continues to lead the world in innovation and economic dynamism, a Romney administration would press for an immigration policy designed to maximize America’s economic potential. The United States needs to attract and retain job creators from wherever they come. Foreign-born residents with advanced degrees start companies, create jobs, and drive innovation at an especially high rate. While lawful immigrants comprise about 8 percent of the population, immigrants start 16 percent of our top-performing, high-technology companies, hold the position of CEO or lead engineer in 25 percent of high-tech firms, and produce over 25 percent of all patent applications filed from the United States.

  • Raise visa caps for highly skilled workers
  • Grant permanent residency to eligible graduates with advanced degrees in math, science, and engineering

Barack Obama jobs plan is not posted on his campaign web site.  Instead his site points to the growth of jobs and offers these successes and plans.

Barack’s Plan

  489,000: Jobs added in the manufacturing sector since January 2010

  233,000: Jobs added in the auto industry since June 2009—the most growth in a decade

  100%: The percent of investment in plants and equipment that businesses could expense under a tax cut extension President Obama proposed, which would spur investment in the United States

  18%: Tax deduction President Obama has proposed for domestic advanced manufacturing technologies—which would double the current 9 percent deduction

  20%: Income tax credit the President has proposed providing to companies on expenses related to moving operations back to the United   States

Neither candidate offers any idea to re-employ those middle class wage earners that have faced a devastatingly long unemployment period.  As matter of fact no one has offered one sensible plan.  If Mitt Romney believes that the independent voters will elect him to office by just saying Obama has failed to re-invigorate the economy he is not likely to gain my support.  He should not gain your support either.  Vague references to re-training programs when the there are no growing industries are not enough.

If my choice is between just another face and no plan then I will vote for Obama.  At least he has the experience that no other job in the world can provide.  Then again why should I vote for a leader who has not been able to change our course?

The Koch Brothers

What You Need to Know About the Financiers of the Radical Right

from http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/2011/04/pdf/koch_brothers.pdf

The Koch brothers’ issue agenda

A list of the top policy issues in which the Koch brothers are engaged

Issue                                                  Koch brothers fighting?

Repealing health reform                                   Yes

Denying climate change                                   Yes

Fighting Wall Street reform                               Yes

Dismantling collective bargaining rights            Yes

Fighting reductions in carbon emissions           Yes

Keeping corporate money in elections              Yes

Fighting Internet neutrality                                 Yes

Supporting the NRA                                           Yes

Sponsoring the Tea Party                                   Yes

Forbes magazine ranks Charles and David Koch the fourth-richest people in the world, with a combined net worth of $44 billion. Charles is the chief executive of Koch Industries, Inc., the family’s oil-and-gas conglomerate started by their father, Fred C. Koch. David is vice president of the company.

From http://www.theshannonfiles.com/2011/02/some-of-koch-brothers-holdings.html

Some of the Koch Brothers Holdings…

Angel Soft toilet paper
Brawny paper towels
Dixie plates, bowls, napkins and cups
Mardi Gras napkins and towels
Quilted Northern toilet paper
Soft ‘n Gentle toilet paper
Sparkle napkins
Vanity fair napkins
Zee napkins

Bob Schieffer Fails the Hardball Test

He [Mitt Romney] has a great allergy to specifics and details

Rich Lowry
National Review

Bob Schieffer
Bob Schieffer

Most probably every Sunday morning political interview program wanted to be the first to interview Mitt Romney.  CBS won the honor but what did they agree not to ask in the interview?  Were the questions submitted in advance so that Romney had an opportunity to prepare his answers?

Mr. Schieffer threw one softball question after another.  Of course Romney was able to answer the questions.

Where were questions like:

  1. Considering that you are so wealthy how can you relate to the average American?
  2. Specifically what will you do as president to help re-employ millions of Americans?
  3. What are the industries that can continue to be the mainstay of the American economy?
  4. How will you reduce the national debt without reducing Medicare and Social Security benefits?
  5. Do we really need a military budget that is six times that of the next highest military budget in the world?
  6. What is your plan on dealing with the 12 million illegal aliens in this country?

Instead we learned nothing except that he will use military action, if necessary, to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear capability.  He sustained his same positions, offered during the GOP debates, on every issue that Bob Schieffer introduced.

I did not expect too many worthwhile answers from Romney.  I did expect Schieffer to ask the hard questions.

Obama Plays Politics on the Issue of Illegal Aliens

“How can we win a majority of the Hispanic vote?” President Obama asks his staff.

I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally,” Ronald Reagan said in 1984.

According to NPR “The law (signed by President Reagan) granted amnesty to nearly 3 million illegal immigrants, yet was largely considered unsuccessful because the strict sanctions on employers were stripped out of the bill for passage.”

What that law did provide was an encouragement of another 12 million illegal immigrants.

What do you suppose Obama’s decision to issue work permits to grown children who came here as babies will do?  My expectation is that there will be another wave of illegal immigrants.