Why are Democratic pundits gloating over the election results? Barack Obama did not win by an overwhelming majority.
The final results from the presidential election are impressive when looking at the Electoral College (332 to 206) but not so impressive when looking at the popular vote (65,258,278 or 50.9% to 60,658,920 or 47.3%). Thus .9% gave the president a win. Hardly a landslide.
Despite that narrow victory Democratic pundits are gleefully hashing out the mistakes made by Mitt Romney and his campaign election team as if they were utterly incompetent.
Wikipedia lists these landslide victories among the popular vote. These were wins worth gloating over.
- 26.2% : Warren Harding‘s 60.3% to James M. Cox‘s 34.1% in the 1920 presidential election
- 25.2% : Calvin Coolidge‘s 54.0% to John W. Davis‘s 28.8% in the 1924 presidential election
- 24.3% : Franklin D. Roosevelt‘s 60.8% to Alf Landon‘s 36.5% in the 1936 presidential election
- 23.2% : Richard Nixon‘s 60.7% to George McGovern‘s 37.5% in the 1972 presidential election
- 22.6% : Lyndon Johnson‘s 61.1% to Barry Goldwater‘s 38.5% in the 1964 presidential election
So while I disagreed with Mitt Romney’s opinions on women’s rights (from pay to abortion and contraception), his lack of concern for 47% of the population, his solution to illegal immigration (self deport), and his confrontational views in foreign policy; almost half of all Americans gave him their vote.
Mr. President stop gloating. You do not have a mandate.






