Joe Biden’s exit was Relief for the Democratic Party

The Democratic Party was obviously heading for a major defeat in the House and Senate if Joe Biden remained as their candidate for president. Even the most loyal party members knew it but were determined to soldier on because that is what lemmings do. This is the reason I have never been active in any political party.

Nancy Pelosi, the highly respected former leader of the Democratic Party in the House of Representatives, had the courage to speak the truth after Biden’s debate performance on Jun 28, 2024. Behind the scenes she was a leading participant in pressuring Biden to drop out of the race.

At this late date primaries to identify another candidate were impossible to conduct. That was the reason Kamala Harris was recommended by Biden.

I do not agree with Democratic Party leadership that they have made the right choice. Harris has been absent from most decision making in the Biden Whitehouse. That is typical. Harry Truman became President after FDR died but Truman did not know about the Manhattan Project until he became president.

If Harris wins on November 5, it will be because Trump can’t focus on issues. Harris is a nice lady but that does not make her the best candidate.

‘I wonder how much this moron will pay’

Matthew Perry had tried for years to stay sober but had a lifelong addiction to alcohol and other drugs. In Perry’s last days one doctor texted another doctor “I wonder how much this moron will pay” and “lets find out,” according to an indictment filed in court.

My question is where were his friends? I guess he had no friends from the program “Friends.” This reminds me of the death of Whitney Houston who also died from a drug overdose. Then there is the case of Michael Jackson who also died from an injection of anesthetic given by a doctor.

Sadly we have a nation of addiction.

Today in History: August 14, FDR signs Social Security Act

On Aug. 14, 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law, ensuring income for elderly Americans and creating a federal unemployment insurance program. 

The Social Security Act was the most important domestic legislation signed into law by FDR.

As of February 2024, approximately 67 million people, or about 1 in 5 US residents, received Social Security benefits. This includes retirees and their families, as well as people who receive Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or are young survivors of deceased workers.

Olympics: Lots of medals. Lots of skin colors. See the connection?

Diversity shows its value in the makeup of Team USA

By Michele Norris, Washington Post

August 10, 2024 at 1:24 p.m. EDT

Right-wing warriors can rail against diversity, equity and inclusion all they want. But the same so-called patriots who aggressively wrap themselves in the flag and claim America as their country cannot be blind to what is on display for all the world to see at the Paris Olympics.

Diversity is now a core part of America’s brand. In gymnastics and swimming. In fencing and rugby. In skateboarding, tennis, boxing, basketball and so much more. In commentary from Snoop Dogg and Flavor Flav. In the massive billboards all over Paris from U.S.-based companies like Nike and Ralph Lauren that feature brown-skinned models. And let’s not forget the music that’s played to pump upthe audience at all the events — whether or not Americans are competing. I was at the Paris Olympics for a few days,and at every venue I visited, American music with a funky beat was the go-to choice to fire upcrowds and athletes from all over the world. As we watch Americans rack up medals, that retrograde Trumpian Make America Great Again message seems silly; America is clearly pretty great right now.

You cannot cheer for the United States in this moment without also cheering on the diversity born of merit. And that is an important point because the ammunition used to instill fears about diversity in a changing America are based on the false notion that Black and Brown people are getting something they don’t deserve.

That is the fib at the heart of the orchestrated effort to dismantle diversity programs. It assumes that the only way to achieve diversity is by bringing on people of color who have lesser skills or qualifications than White candidates. This is what feeds the idea —no, make that the lie — that under credentialed people of color are pushing White candidates out of their rightful place.

Diversity is not about lowering standards. It’s about widening the aperture to make sure an organization can find the best talent available. It’s about reaching beyond one’s comfort zone or personal network to look for talent and potential in areas that might be unfamiliar. So often, access to opportunity is based on something sociologists call “homosociality” – friendship, mentoring, social circles and cliques based on commonality and comfort. It’s the jolt of reassurance or even relief at finding someone who appears to be the right fit because they have the right background and the right skin color, they went to the right school, they engage in the right sports (golf or sport fishing, for instance), or they speak in the right vernacular. People drift to the familiar. It’s human nature.

This is why the world of sports provides a useful antidote. While sports teams and athletic organizations may have limited their scope of recruitment in the past — based on tradition, bias or the belief that certain kinds of people lacked certain innate characteristics — that line of thinking has eroded faster in sport than other sectors. Remember: It wasn’t that long ago that Black men were not considered quarterback material.

Coaches and recruiters will go where the talent is and cast an ever-widening net to find it. Why? Because they know that talent is equally distributed but opportunity is not. They know that the potential for greatness percolates in all kinds of places, and if they spot it early, they can nurture it toward victory without lowering standards. And they know that staying in their personal socio-economic comfort zonescould keep them from winning.

The Olympic Games are about winning — and so much more. I’ve always loved watching the Games on TV with my family in part because of the learning experience it provides: calmness under pressure. Grace in defeat. People from all over the world coming together to chase their dreams. After a year of pugilistic politics and attacks on diversity programs, the Olympics once again deliver an avalanche of life lessons.

At a time when members of one political party will not commit to accepting the outcome of the upcoming election, it is heartening to watch top athletes shake hands with the competitors who beat them and step aside so the victors can bask in their earned glory. And the mosaic of diverse athletes — often in sports that until recently did not include many people of color — is also a reflection of American values and the cultural diversity at the core of this multiethnic country.

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t cheer on Team USA without cheering on the diversity that makes Team USA great.

What did Donald Trump accomplish as president?

As identified by The Week magazine these were Donald Trump’s significant accomplishments during his presidency.

The judiciary

Trump’s “most lasting impact on the country” is likely the drastic reshaping of America’s courts, Business Insider said. By installing more than 200 federal judges, including 54 who “reshaped the ideological makeup of federal appeals courts” and three who drove a “generational shift in the highest court in the land,” Trump’s impact on the judicial branch of government overall will “continue shaping the American legal and political landscape for decades,” CNN said. 

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Trump’s 2017 tax bill — colloquially The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act — was arguably his “biggest legislative achievement,” which was intended, per Trump, to “super-charge the economy,” said Politico. It was also the “biggest tax overhaul since the Tax Reform Act of 1986,” the Brookings Institute said, but “skewed toward the rich” and “failed to deliver promised economic benefits,” said the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. One unambiguous takeaway: “U.S. corporations got to keep more of their money, and the U.S. government got less,” said Bloomberg.

Space Force

It was the stuff of jokes and mockery when Trump announced in 2018 that he planned to back a long dormant plan to create a sixth, space-focused branch of the U.S. Armed Services — the first new branch since the Air Force was founded in the wake of World War II. But just one year after its official founding in 2019, Space Force had “developed from a theoretical concept to an operational service fully engaged in a broad spectrum of activities,” West Point’s Lieber Institute said. While the Space Force’s annual budget grew over the first four years of its existence, that upward trend “will stop in fiscal 2025, for which the service is requesting $29.4 billion, down $0.6 billion from last year,” Defense One said.

Criminal justice reform  

While much of Trump’s experience in the realm of criminal justice has been as a litigant, rather than policy expert, he nevertheless helped champion the historic First Step Act, the “most sweeping set of changes to the federal criminal justice system since the 1990s,” NBC said. The bipartisan-backed law “allows thousands of people to earn an earlier release from prison and could cut many more prison sentences in the future,” said Vox, and represents “modest steps to alter the federal criminal justice system and ease very punitive prison sentences at the federal level.” The law has shown “promising results thus far,” with beneficiaries showing recidivism rates “considerably lower than those who were released from prison without benefit of the law,” The Sentencing Project said. 

Democrats are Living in a Fantasy World

The giddy excitement over the selection of Tim Walz for vice president may make Democrats feel good for the moment but it is unlikely to change the outcome of the November election. No one decided to vote for President Joe Biden based on his decision to select Kamala Harris as his running mate.

John McCain’s selection of Sarah Palin was not the reason he lost his election for president. Barack Obama wasn’t elected president because he chose to run alongside Joe Biden. Mitt Romney didn’t lose his White House bid because Paul D. Ryan was his pick for vice president.

So far Kamala Harris has not offered one thought about what she will do if elected president. We have all heard Donald Trump’s plans to raise tariffs, close the border, and expel illegal aliens among other promises. From Harris we have heard nothing.

Some of you may remember the 1984 US presidential campaign in which Walter Mondale used this slogan, “Where’s the beef?” to ridicule his rival for the Democratic nomination.

I am asking the same question in 2024.