Banks are Too Big To Fail! Is it true?

“SAN FRANCISCO(MarketWatch) — Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the ratings late Thursday of 15 financial firms with global capital-markets operations from one to three notches.”  The list included Bank of America Corp. BAC, Citigroup Inc. C, HSBC Holdings PLC.  These three are on the list of America’s largest banks.

Largest banks and thrifts in US by total deposits

Company                       City, State            Deposits in Billions of Dollars

JPMorgan Chase & Co.                            New York, NY            1,127.8

Bank of America Corp.                            Charlotte, NC              1,033.0

Citigroup Inc.                                          New York, NY                 865.9

Wells Fargo & Co.                                  San Francisco, CA           920.1

U.S. Bancorp                                          Minneapolis, MN             230.9

Capital One Financial Corp.                 McLean, VA                     211.2

Bank of New York Mellon Corp.         New York, NY                    219.1

PNC Financial Services Group Inc.     Pittsburgh, PA                    209.2

HSBC North America Holdings Inc.      New York, NY                   122.6

State Street Corp.                                Boston, MA                        157.3

This identical data was printed in Forbes and The WSJ.

Yes, you read it correctly, JPMorgan Chase & Co. has deposits of One Trillion, onehundred twenty eight Billion point eight dollars.

Moody’s says “All the banks affected by these rating actions have significant exposure to the volatility and risks inherent in the capital markets business, which have led many to fail or avoid it only through the receipt of support from a third party.”  We can all conclude that the third party is a government or government sponsored entity.

Banks receive aid but the aid to small business and home owners is minimal.  If it isn’t called welfare, what do you call government support for banks?

American Exceptionalism and the Reality of a Competitive World Economy

American exceptionalism is the theory that the United States is different from other countries.

Working class Americans (that is most of us) are in a perpetual struggle to live a comfortable life.  However, we are on the brink of a new reality.  We must compete with every other country in the world.  Will American exceptionalism prevail?

The Washington Post reports that American median income fell nearly 8 percent, to $45,800, in 2010. This is no surprise.  It is simply a validation of what we already knew.  It is not going to get better any time soon.  In that same article the Post said our wealth has declined by 40%.  That too is no surprise since home have values have dropped by 40% to 50% in most areas of the country.

Many will try to blame one of the two political parties.  That would be a mistake.  If you look at the laws passed and the trends of American business you will quickly realize that this state of affairs has been going on for decades but was accelerated by the Great Recession.

The painful reality is that Americans must become more ingenious in their struggle to earn the kinds of livings that has become part of the culture.  Our politicians keep telling us that Americans are unique, creative, and exceptional.

  

Today that all seem like a lot of baloney.

Self Annihilation

We visited a Loew’s Home Improvement store to check their table lamp selection.  My wife’s idea.  She found precisely what she wanted.  The price for each lamp was $14.97 and included a light bulb.  The shades cost about the same price.  The lamps and shades are made in China.  It is an astonishingly low price.  I would have been willing to pay twice that amount.

Can you imagine the pay rate for those working in the factory that manufactures those lamps and shades?  Probably on the order of 50 cents an hour.  That is the pay rate in Mexico.

So we Americans buy low cost products manufactured in China and that makes us feel good.  Think about this.  Those lamps and shades were formerly made in the U.S.A.  We get bargains that put our neighbors out of work.

What is the American policy (or for that matter the policy in any other country) regarding the export of our jobs?

Personally I would gladly pay more for the lamps if I knew that Americans have the income that takes them off the unemployment rolls and welfare rolls.  Am I wrong?

Capitalism is the Dominant force in the U.S.A.

Why Barack Obama Cannot Re-Make America

The American system of free enterprise is designed for people to make money.  Those that are smartest find every way to earn money, as long as it is legal, no matter who it hurts.

Bain Capital is an asset management and financial services company that provides venture money for new and struggling companies.  Like any privately held company it is in business to earn the highest possible return for its investors.  There are many other companies like Bain Capital.  The Blackstone Group and the Carlyle Group to name just another two.  Sam Zell, a wealthy real estate investor in Chicago, bought the Tribune Company without investing a single dime of his own money (thanks to some ingenious financing) but the company is now bankrupt (you thought he bought it to prop up that company?).

John_Hancock
John_Hancock

The system has always functioned that way.  The founding of the nation was all about free enterprise.  Those leaders in Philadelphia were mostly rich men who objected to taxation by the crown.  They invented the expression “taxation without representation” to rally the general public.  The best example is John Hancock.  Before the American Revolution, Hancock was one of the wealthiest men in the Thirteen Colonies, having inherited a profitable shipping business from his uncle.  John Adams was a well to do lawyer living in the Boston area.  Thomas Jefferson and George Washington were both wealthy land owners in Virginia.

If you do not agree with this form of economics you will have to live elsewhere.  You will not be successful in changing 200 plus years of a system that has built the wealthiest nation in the world.

Alternative countries that you ought to consider are Italy, France, Germany, Canada, UK, Australia, and New   Zealand.  You might notice that many of these countries are part of the British Commonwealth that Americans hated in 1776.  They do have capitalism but also make a greater effort at providing more social programs.

The choice is yours.  Just stop complaining about our system.  It is what it is!

Top 20 Jobs That Don’t Require A College Degree

LAUSD plans to require all high school students to take college prep classes in order to graduate.  However there are hundreds and perhaps thousands of jobs that do not require a college degree. As reported on AOL.COM here is a list of the top 20 jobs not requiring that diploma.

Careercast.com put together a list of the top 20 jobs that don’t require a college degree, ranked by average starting salary, income growth and employment growth. Income growth refers to percentage of growth from starting earnings to the top level; and employment growth refers to the projected increase in number of jobs through 2020 according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

1. Dental Hygienist

    • Average Starting Salary: $45,000
    • Income Growth: 109%
    • Employment Growth: 37.70%

2. Online Sales Manager

    • Average Starting Salary: $40,000
    • Income Growth: 255%
    • Employment Growth: 25.00%

3. Web Developer

    • Average Starting Salary: $43,000
    • Income Growth: 179%
    • Employment Growth: 21.70%

4. Medical Secretary

    • Average Starting Salary: $21,000
    • Income Growth: 114%
    • Employment Growth: 41.30%

5. Paralegal Assistant

    • Average Starting Salary: $29,000
    • Income Growth: 159%
    • Employment Growth: 18.30%

6. Stenographer / Court Reporter

    • Average Starting Salary: $26,000
    • Income Growth: 250%
    • Employment Growth: 14.10%

7. Heating / Refrigeration Mechanic

    • Average Starting Salary: $26,000
    • Income Growth: 158%
    • Employment Growth: 33.70%

8. Surveyor

    • Average Starting Salary: $31,000
    • Income Growth: 190%
    • Employment Growth: 25.40%

9. Executive Assistant

    • Average Starting Salary: $29,000
    • Income Growth: 131%
    • Employment Growth: 12.60%

10. Insurance Agent

    • Average Starting Salary: $26,000
    • Income Growth: 342%
    • Employment Growth: 21.90%

11. Industrial Machine Repairer

    • Average Starting Salary: $30,000
    • Income Growth: 127%
    • Employment Growth: 21.60 %

12. Cosmetologist

    • Average Starting Salary: $16,000
    • Income Growth: 163%
    • Employment Growth: 15.70%

13. Hair Stylist

    • Average Starting Salary: $16,000
    • Income Growth: 163%
    • Employment Growth: 15.70%

14. Tax Examiner / Collector

    • Average Starting Salary: $30,000
    • Income Growth: 207%
    • Employment Growth: 7.30%

15. Sales Representative – Wholesale

    • Average Starting Salary: $27,000
    • Income Growth: 304%
    • Employment Growth: 15.60%

16. Construction Machinery Operator

    • Average Starting Salary: $26,000
    • Income Growth: 173%
    • Employment Growth: 23.50%

17. Electrical Technician

    • Average Starting Salary: $34,000
    • Income Growth: 138%
    • Employment Growth: 1.90%

18. Architectural Drafter

    • Average Starting Salary: $30,000
    • Income Growth: 140%
    • Employment Growth: 3.20

19. Teacher’s Aide

    • Average Starting Salary: $17,000
    • Income Growth: 112%
    • Employment Growth: 14.80%

20. Sewage Plant Operator

    • Average Starting Salary: $25,000
    • Income Growth: 156%
    • Employment Growth: 11.60%

Barack Obama’s Failed Recovery

It seems the president’s likeability has remained high even though his success leading the country leaves a lot to be desired.  The number one issue facing him at his inauguration was the growing number of unemployed Americans.

It is accurate to say that the continuing increase in the number of unemployed has been stopped. The worst of the unemployment crises has passed.  However, the number of unemployed Americans has remained basically unchanged.  The apparent improved unemployment picture is the result of people giving up in searching for a job.  Those giving up aren’t counted.  It takes 150,000 new jobs a month to keep up with our growing population.  (The number of new jobs added in April was a horribly disappointing 115,000.)  Once you deduct that leveling number of 150,000 you see that real job growth has been small.

The one significant exception to this situation is the re-employment of people in the manufacture of automobiles.

Every country has something to sell to its own people and the rest of the world.  The United States has one major export, agricultural products.   Brazil has five. Oil, iron ore, soybeans, coffee, and steel. Brazil now holds 45% of the world’s steel production.

Meanwhile the U.S.A.has a $15 trillion economy but only has $1.5 trillion in exports.  Worse we import $2.4 trillion in goods.

Thanks to the ever growing number of free trade agreements most of the things we buy were manufactured in another country.  The auto industry and agricultural products are the only major industries that have not been entirely exported.  Here in Southern California Costco now has a variety of fruits and vegetables imported from Latin America.

Not only are there no plans to change this situation, but Obama has signed free trade agreements with Columbia and South Korea.

Retraining programs for the unemployed?  To do what?

You notice that Barack Obama never talks about the unemployed.  No wonder, his “hope and change” have brought hope there is enough food stamps to buy next week’s food and his change never happened at all unless adding to the federal debt is counted as change.

As bad a Mitt Romney may be is he as bad as four more years of Obama?  Isn’t it time for a change?  Democrats and independents hold your nose.

When You Retire Will the Money be There?

No one cares more about your savings and investments more than you.  You need to become an expert on the kinds of investments that you are comfortable with holding.  Don’t let a financial adviser take control of your funds.  No matter what he/she says, they do not understand your true wishes and needs.  They will not be the one in pain if those savings are lost.

The unpleasant reality is that most of us do not save enough money for our retirement years.  The reason is obvious.  The cost of living takes our paychecks.  It’s not a new situation.  This has been a fact for all of history.  It is the reason that Social Security was created in the 1930s.  That insurance provides sufficient income in retirement years to prevent starvation.  It is only enough to pay for food, housing, and other basic necessities.

The problem is that Social Security has become the only income resource for many retired Americans.  (401(k) plans have not become the outstanding resource that many believed would occur.  The reason is they are not a mandatory savings plan.  It is a voluntary program.  The average balance in all 50 million (401(k) accounts is just over $60,000 according to the Employee Benefit Institute.  Even people within 10 years of retirement have saved an average of only $78,000, and more than a third have less than $25,000.

I still hear financial gurus saying that you should be receiving 10% or more on your savings.  I know such investments do exist but they are not well known.  Those that do pay that level of return are high risk securities that most people are not prepared to take.  Even Vanguard’s High Yield Corporate Bond Fund pays 6.75%.

Even if you savings are small there are magazines you can view in the library and sites that do not charge anything.  My favorite is Morningstar.  You do not have to subscribe to obtain much of their information.

Start today thinking about where your income will come from when that day comes when you want to say “It’s time for me to retire.”

Things are Getting Better?

The unemployment rate decreased .1% last month. That sounds good but the cause was more people giving up on searching for a job.  There weren’t even enough jobs created last month to keep up with increased population. 

Today’s Bureau of Labor Statistics report included the following statement. “The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over)was essentially unchanged at 5.3 million in March. These individuals accounted for 42.5 percent of the unemployed. Since April 2010, the number of long-term unemployed has fallen by 1.4 million.”

There is the problem that neither President Obama nor Mitt Romney has addressed. American industry doesn’t need most of those long term unemployed. The reason is that technology and the export of American jobs has reduced the numbers of people required in the United States.

The president’s job plan does include the following proposals
– A $4,000 tax credit to employers for hiring long-term unemployed workers.
– Prohibiting employers from discriminating against unemployed workers when hiring.
Nice gestures that do not answer the question of who will hire these un-needed people?

I have found nothing in Mitt Romney’s proposals that even suggest any solutions. His focus is on “free market.” My question is, where were the free markets under George W. Bush when the economy was in free fall?

My solution is higher tariffs on all imported products. Neither Obama nor Romney agree with that solution.  They don’t have a solution!

The Issue is Long Term Unemployment

From the Bureau of Labor Statistics report dated today, March, 9, 2012.
“The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) was little changed at 5.4 million in February. These individuals accounted for 42.6 percent of the unemployed.”

“The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons(sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) was essentially unchanged at 8.1 million in February. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job.”

Perhaps this answers the question, why is one in seven Americans receiving aid to buy food?

Millions of people lost jobs in the last four years, and being plunged into poverty made them eligible for food assistance. “That’s the way this program is designed,” said Kevin Concannon, the head of the USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service. Some 15 percent of the population-the highest rate since 1993-now lives at or below the poverty level, which is defined as $19,090 per year for a family of three. The average food stamp household of 2.2 people receives $287 in monthly food-assistance benefits, or about $72 a week. That’s not a lot to feed two people, but food stamp spending adds up: It has quadrupled in the course of the last 10 years, to a total this year of $80.4 billion. Critics blame that cost explosion on relaxed eligibility standards that began under the Bush administration, and on a boost in monthly benefits put through by Obama as part of the 2009 stimulus package. Obama increased the amount of time people could stay on food stamps, and added about $80 to the monthly benefits of a family of four. “No program in our government has surged out of control more dramatically than food stamps,” said Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama.

The issue is the millions who are unemployed with no job opportunities on the horizon. Our nation’s leaders in both political parties have not offered any solutions. 

HAVE THEY?

Three Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die

Thought this article very interesting.  Especially with information cited coming from notable sources.  This among so many other issues can only leave us wondering how much misinformation we are fed . . . or simply on the face of it, how much we choose to believe.

Love the quote from Evan Thomas who said. . . “You are entitled to your own opinion, but you’re not entitled to your own facts.”  Hmmmm
Three Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
By Morgan Housel, Columnist at The Motley Fool, USC graduate in Economics

 

At a conference in Philadelphia last October, a Wharton professor noted that one of the country’s biggest economic problems is a tsunami of misinformation. You can’t have a rational debate when facts are so easily supplanted by overreaching statements, broad generalizations, and misconceptions. And if you can’t have a rational debate, how does anything important get done? As author William Feather once advised, “Beware of the person who can’t be bothered by details.” There seems to be no shortage of those people lately.

Here are three misconceptions that need to be put to rest.

Misconception No. 1: Most of what Americans spend their money on is made in China.

Fact: Just 2.7% of personal consumption expenditures go to Chinese-made goods and services. 88.5% of U.S. consumer spending is on American-made goods and services. I used that statistic in a recent article, and the response from readers was overwhelming: Hogwash. People just didn’t believe it.

 

The figure comes from a Federal Reserve report. You can read it here.

A common rebuttal I got was, “How can it only be 2.7% when almost everything in Walmart (WMT) is made in China?” Because Walmart’s $260 billion in U.S. revenue isn’t exactly reflective of America’s $14.5 trillion economy. Walmart might sell a broad range of knickknacks, many of which are made in China, but the vast majority of what Americans spend their money on is not knickknacks.

 

The Bureau of Labor Statistics closely tracks how an average American spends their money in an annual report called the Consumer Expenditure Survey. In 2010, the average American spent 34% of their income on housing, 13% on food, 11% on insurance and pensions, 7% on health care, and 2% on education. Those categories alone make up nearly 70% of total spending, and are comprised almost entirely of American-made goods and services (only 7% of food is imported, according to the USDA).
Even when looking at physical goods alone, Chinese imports still account for just a small fraction of U.S. spending. Just 6.4% of nondurable goods — things like food, clothing and toys — purchased in the U.S. are made in China; 76.2% are made in America. For durable goods — things like cars and furniture — 12% are made in China; 66.6% are made in America.

Another way to grasp the value of Chinese-made goods is to look at imports. The U.S. imported $399 billion worth of goods from China last year, which is 2.7% of our $14.5 trillion economy. Is that a lot? Yes. Is it most of what we spend our money on? Not by a long shot.

 

Part of the misconception is likely driven by the notion that America’s manufacturing base has been in steep decline. The truth, surprising to many, is that real manufacturing output today is near an all-time high. What’s dropped precipitously in recent decades is manufacturing employment. Technology and automation has allowed American manufacturers to build more stuff with far fewer workers than in the past. One good example: In 1950, a U.S. Steel (X) plant in Gary, Ind., produced 6 million tons of steel with 30,000 workers. Today, it produces 7.5 million tons with 5,000 workers. Output has gone up; employment has dropped like a rock.

 

Misconception No. 2:We owe most of our debt to China.

Fact: China owns 7.6% of U.S. government debt outstanding.

As of November, China owned $1.13 trillion of Treasuries. Government debt stood at $14.9 trillion that month. That’s 7.6%.

Who owns the rest? The largest holder of U.S. debt is the federal government itself. Various government trust funds like the Social Security trust fund own about $4.4 trillion worth of Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve owns another $1.6 trillion.

Both are unique owners: Interest paid on debt held by federal trust funds is used to cover a portion of federal spending, and the vast majority of interest earned by the Federal Reserve is remitted back to the U.S. Treasury.

The rest of our debt is owned by state and local governments ($700 billion), private domestic investors ($3.1 trillion), and other non-Chinese foreign investors ($3.5 trillion).

Does China own a lot of our debt? Yes, but it’s a qualified yes. Of all Treasury debt held by foreigners, China is indeed the largest owner ($1.13 trillion), followed by Japan $1 trillion) and the U.K. ($429 billion).

Right there, you can see that Japan and the U.K. combined own more U.S. debt than China. Now, how many times have you heard someone say that we borrow an inordinate amount of money from Japan and the U.K.? I never have. But how often do you hear some version of the “China is our banker” line? Too often, I’d say.

Misconception No. 3:We get most of our oil from the Middle East. Fact: Just 9.8% of oil consumed in the U.S. comes from the Middle East.

According the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the U.S. consumes 19.2 million barrels of petroleum products per day. Of that amount, a net 49% is produced domestically. The rest is imported.

Where is it imported from? Only a small fraction comes from the Middle East, and that fraction has been declining in recent years. Last year, imports from the Persian Gulf region — which includes Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates — made up 9.8% of total petroleum supplied to the U.S. In 2001, that number was 14.1%.

The U.S. imports more than twice as much petroleum from Canada and Mexico than it does from the Middle East. Add in the share produced domestically, and the majority of petroleum consumed in the U.S. comes from North America.

This isn’t to belittle our energy situation. The nation still relies on imports for about half of its oil. That’s bad. But should the Middle East get the attention it does when we talk about oil reliance? In terms of security and geopolitical stability, perhaps. In terms of volume, probably not.