Shohei Ohtani and the Dodgers are a win away from going to the Word Series.
After a 10-2 victory over the New York Mets in Game 4 of the NL Championship Series at Citi Field on Thursday night, the Dodgers owned a three-games-to-one lead that is essentially insurmountable.
How good are these Dodgers? They dominated Thursday night with essentially their “B” team, Freddie Freeman and Gavin Lux out, Chris Taylor playing second base, Edman batting cleanup.
Coming soon, the World Series beckons, whether it is clinched Friday night here in Game 5 or next week at Dodger Stadium, it’s happening, the Dodgers are winning one more game against a Mets team that has quit.
I am looking forward to a Dodgers versus the Yankees World Series. Yankees are ahead in the playoff 2-1 over the Guardians.
Diversity shows its value in the makeup of Team USA
By Michele Norris, Washington Post
August 10, 2024 at 1:24 p.m. EDT
Right-wing warriors can rail against diversity, equity and inclusion all they want. But the same so-called patriots who aggressively wrap themselves in the flag and claim America as their country cannot be blind to what is on display for all the world to see at the Paris Olympics.
Diversity is now a core part of America’s brand. In gymnastics and swimming. In fencing and rugby. In skateboarding, tennis, boxing, basketball and so much more. In commentary from Snoop Dogg and Flavor Flav. In the massive billboards all over Paris from U.S.-based companies like Nike and Ralph Lauren that feature brown-skinned models. And let’s not forget the music that’s played to pump upthe audience at all the events — whether or not Americans are competing. I was at the Paris Olympics for a few days,and at every venue I visited, American music with a funky beat was the go-to choice to fire upcrowds and athletes from all over the world. As we watch Americans rack up medals, that retrograde Trumpian Make America Great Again message seems silly; America is clearly pretty great right now.
You cannot cheer for the United States in this moment without also cheering on the diversity born of merit. And that is an important point because the ammunition used to instill fears about diversity in a changing America are based on the false notion that Black and Brown people are getting something they don’t deserve.
That is the fib at the heart of the orchestrated effort to dismantle diversity programs. It assumes that the only way to achieve diversity is by bringing on people of color who have lesser skills or qualifications than White candidates. This is what feeds the idea —no, make that the lie — that under credentialed people of color are pushing White candidates out of their rightful place.
Diversity is not about lowering standards. It’s about widening the aperture to make sure an organization can find the best talent available. It’s about reaching beyond one’s comfort zone or personal network to look for talent and potential in areas that might be unfamiliar. So often, access to opportunity is based on something sociologists call “homosociality” – friendship, mentoring, social circles and cliques based on commonality and comfort. It’s the jolt of reassurance or even relief at finding someone who appears to be the right fit because they have the right background and the right skin color, they went to the right school, they engage in the right sports (golf or sport fishing, for instance), or they speak in the right vernacular. People drift to the familiar. It’s human nature.
This is why the world of sports provides a useful antidote. While sports teams and athletic organizations may have limited their scope of recruitment in the past — based on tradition, bias or the belief that certain kinds of people lacked certain innate characteristics — that line of thinking has eroded faster in sport than other sectors. Remember: It wasn’t that long ago that Black men were not considered quarterback material.
Coaches and recruiters will go where the talent is and cast an ever-widening net to find it. Why? Because they know that talent is equally distributed but opportunity is not. They know that the potential for greatness percolates in all kinds of places, and if they spot it early, they can nurture it toward victory without lowering standards. And they know that staying in their personal socio-economic comfort zonescould keep them from winning.
The Olympic Games are about winning — and so much more. I’ve always loved watching the Games on TV with my family in part because of the learning experience it provides: calmness under pressure. Grace in defeat. People from all over the world coming together to chase their dreams. After a year of pugilistic politics and attacks on diversity programs, the Olympics once again deliver an avalanche of life lessons.
At a time when members of one political party will not commit to accepting the outcome of the upcoming election, it is heartening to watch top athletes shake hands with the competitors who beat them and step aside so the victors can bask in their earned glory. And the mosaic of diverse athletes — often in sports that until recently did not include many people of color — is also a reflection of American values and the cultural diversity at the core of this multiethnic country.
You can’t have it both ways. You can’t cheer on Team USA without cheering on the diversity that makes Team USA great.
Underinflated footballs, drugs, bribery and kickbacks. It’s all part of the sports world.
From World Cup venue picks to draws, international soccer has been surrounded by rumors of alleged kickbacks. Whispers around world soccer and kickbacks now scream from headlines. The media has told us what we already suspected. Finally the U.S. Justice department has filed charges against at least nine top ranking officials and they say this is just the beginning.
Consider the annual Tour de France. Lance Edward Armstrong is the American former professional who previously held seven consecutive Tour de France titles from 1999 to 2005, but was stripped of his titles in 2012 after a protracted doping scandal. Most of us did not care. Maybe we do care. After all Armstrong’s interviews with Oprah Winfrey drew a considerable number of viewers.
Like most high-profile team sports, football and Baseball suffers from recreational drug use. Why do they do it?
The National Football League announced that ESPN had operating income of $1.6 billion in 2013. NBC, CBS, and Fox News all have their own sports channels. ABC owns ESPN.
Football players are likely to be impacted for the rest of their lives from brain injuries. The do make millions of dollars while they are playing.
A football team moving to Los Angeles is all about the best financial deal the club owners can make. Now a bigger and better stadium translates into a move. St. Louis, Oakland, and San Diego are all working on their teams to stay by offering financial incentives and new stadiums.
The most expensive part of pay television is the sport channel fees paid by the providers to the various professional leagues.
What is all of this about? MONEY!
We pay for it but we don’t care. The people who run all of those professional sports teams, college teams and all the other sport events that are broadcast on television are earning millions of dollars. We love the excitement and they love the money.
Barry Bonds was a sports hero but he has not played baseball since 2007. He holds many baseball records. He was charged with using performance enhancing steroids. He has been accused of using those steroids as early as 2000.
Bonds is not the only sports figure accused of using performance drugs. Lance Armstrong, winner of the Tour de France seven times. He does not deny using drugs.
There is little point in listing all of the sports personalities who have been accused of using drugs. The issue is winning and making big money.
Money is the driving force. Owners of professional teams are aware that there is the use of drugs. It is not a new occurrence. This has been happening for many years.
So what is new about the Alex Rodriquez suspension? He is quoted as saying, “I am disappointed with the penalty and intend to appeal and fight this through the process.” No denial! The Yankees? They are permitting him to play tonight.
You want me to attend baseball games? You want me to support drug use?
At the beginning of this commentary I confess to not being a big sports enthusiast. I watch three to four football games each year. UCLA vs. USC, the Rose Bowl, the Super Bowl and one more time at random. I watch the World Series and the NBA finals.
I believe that the professional teams know that some of their players are using drugs to enhance their performance. They just don’t want to confront the issue. After all a Barry Bonds hitting run after run draws larger crowds to the games and that translates to more money.
Are all extraordinary performances the result of drugs? Of course not. However, if owners of clubs want to sustain their reputations they need to enforce the rules that they have created.
As to the Tour de France bike race. This is supposed to be an amateur race but clearly there is significant money to be earned. Besides the prizes that are as high as €450,000($601,000 USD) and there are the salaries for pro team riders that range as high as €190,000. The Seattle Times reported,“Amid a booming market for TV sports rights, the Tour could be worth as much as $1 billion, says Conor O’Shea, a media analyst in Paris at Kepler Capital Markets. Is it any wonder that Lance Armstrong would be taking drugs to win?”
Where are the screeners who check for drug use? Where are the owners, managers, and others who are responsible for keeping sports drug free? The answer is simple. Money and fame are more important than honesty.
Who cares? Not many people. They watch the sports for entertainment. The public will ultimately abandon events that are not honest. Example: no one in America takes wrestling (WWE) seriously because it is thought of as pre-planned entertainment.
At the outset let me say that I left Pennsylvania at the age of 10. I rarely watch any football games. The penalties against Penn State will not effect me one tiny bit.
The NCAA “erased 14 years of victories, wiping out 111 of Paterno’s wins and stripping him of his standing as the most successful coach in the history of big-time college football.” This was part of an Associated Press report today.
It makes no sense. I am not defending the behavior of Jerry Sandusky, Joe Paterno or anyone else at Penn State. I am defending the players on the Penn State football squad.There is no evidence that Few of those players were involved or even knew about the child abuse. Those players were on football fields and they won the games fairly. No one disputes this fact. The $60 million fines are debatable. The four-year ban from postseason play will send a message to all universities. Removing the success records of the 111 wins is a penalty against the players not the school.
Unfortunately the NCAA wants to show that it has the power to manage the behavior of everyone associated with amateur sports. If only the NCAA was as concerned about on field football injuries.