Pacific Rim Tran-Pacific Partnership Agreement is not Dead!

Talks on the Pacific Rim trade pact (TPP) have stalled. And some international media are blaming Canada: Justin Trudeau did not show up to meet other leaders.

Regardless of who is to blame, it does appear that a TPP agreement might still be completed. It will be the United States that will be the loser because the other nations will have a valuable free trade zone while the United States will be denied access to the many business opportunities that free trade provides.

The following article appeared in the Toronto Star newspaper.

DANANG, VIETNAM—Trade ministers from 11 Pacific Rim countries said they reached an agreement Saturday to proceed with the free-trade Trans-Pacific Partnership deal that President Donald Trump abandoned it. However, an immediate formal endorsement by the countries’ leaders meeting in Vietnam appeared unlikely.

A statement issued in the early hours Saturday said an accord was reached on “core elements” of the 11-member pact. The compromise was delayed by last-minute disagreements that prevented the TPP leaders from meeting to endorse a plan on Friday.

“Ministers are pleased to announce that they have agreed on the core elements of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership,” the 11 nations said in a statement.

Japan’s delegate to the talks, Economy Minister Toshimitsu Motegi, told reporters that disagreements that cropped up Friday had been resolved in five hours of talks that stretched late into the night.

“We have confirmed there was no mistake about us having reached a basic agreement,” Motegi said.

Despite enthusiasm for sticking with the plan following the U.S. withdrawal under Trump in January, criticism over various issues persists. Detractors of the TPP say it favours corporate interests over labour and other rights.

Aspects of the trade pact have raised hackles also over a requirement that companies be allowed to sue governments for lack of enforcement of related laws.

The proposed basic agreement reached in Danang said that the ministers maintained “the high standards, overall balance and integrity of the TPP while ensuring the commercial and other interests of all participants and preserving our inherent right to regulate, including the flexibility of the parties to set legislative and regulatory priorities.”

The TPP member countries are trying to find a way forward without the U.S., the biggest economy and, before Trump took office, one of its most assertive supporters. Trump has said he prefers country-to-country deals and is seeking to renegotiate several major trade agreements to, as he says, “put America first.”

Trump reiterated his markedly different stance on trade before the 21-member APEC summit convened late Friday with a gala banquet.
The U.S. president told an APEC business conference that “we are not going to let the United States be taken advantage of anymore.” He lambasted the World Trade Organization and other trade forums as unfair to the United States and reiterated his preference for bilateral trade deals, saying “I am always going to put America first.”

Trump said he would not enter into large trade agreements, alluding to U.S. involvement in the North American Free Trade Agreement and the TPP.

In contrast, Chinese President Xi Jinping told the same group that nations need to stay committed to economic openness or risk being left behind.

The Chinese president drew loud applause when he urged support for the “multilateral trading regime” and progress toward a free-trade zone in the Asia-Pacific. China is not part of the TPP.

APEC operates by consensus and customarily issues nonbinding statements. TPP commitments would eventually be ratified and enforced by its members.

But even talks this week on a declaration to cap the APEC summit had to be extended for an extra half day as ministers haggled over wording. It’s unclear what the exact sticking points were, but officials have alluded to differences over the unequal impact more open trade has had on workers and concerns over automation in manufacturing that could leave many millions in a wide array of industries with no work to do.

As a developing country with a fast-growing export sector, this year’s host country, Vietnam, has a strong interest in open trade and access for its exports to consumers in the West. The summit is an occasion for its leaders to showcase the progress its economy has made thanks largely to foreign investment and trade. Danang, Vietnam’s third largest city, is in the midst of a construction boom as dozens of resorts and smaller hotels pop up along its scenic coastline.

APEC’s members are Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, the U.S. and Vietnam.

Say NO to New Free Trade Agreements

Are you all asleep?  Haven’t you noticed that all of your clothes are not made in America?  When did you see any item that was made in America? I have found a few but they are rare and have had only the smallest effect on our country.  Think Cutco Knives and American Apparel.   Call for technical help and you speak to someone in India or the Philippines.  Southern California Edison is reportedly bringing in Indian workers to be trained here, then return to their home country to take the jobs of those who did the training.  Honda and Whirlpool are just two of the many manufacturers who have built factories in Mexico that will save those companies millions of dollars in labor costs.  The average worker pay in a Mexican auto assembly plant is $5.64 per hour versus $27.78 per hour in the United States.  All of this is today, before a Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement is put into place.  Where are the jobs that NAFTA was forecast to bring to America?

The jobs did come to America.  They just aren’t the jobs we had hoped for.  It’s called Logistics. That’s a fancy word for distribution and warehouse jobs.  Those are the jobs of truck drivers, unloading and loading trucks, putting away and pulling products using hand carts, fork lifts, and other warehouse equipment.  Those mostly poor paying jobs are going to the poorly educated including illegal aliens.

Democrats talk a good line but they need the contributions that big business supplies.  Hillary Clinton, as of this date, refuses to take a position on the TPP.  For reasons that are a mystery to me many people believe the Democratic Party is concerned about the shrinking American Middle Class.  There is no evidence that either political party cares one iota.  They do care about money for their next campaign.  Everyone needs to put pressure on their representative (congressman) to stop sending jobs out of the country.